By Radu Ioanid
Read Online or Download The Sword of the Archangel: Fascist Ideology in Romania PDF
Similar elections & political process books
What makes despotic leaders tick? How do they turn into despots? On a lesser (but way more universal) scale: why are a few humans ruthlessly abrasive within the place of work? Why do a little company leaders seem to lose their feel of humanity? How and why do they bring a tradition of worry, uncertainty and doubt of their businesses?
The uk faces with significant federal constitutional debates. the 1st is ready the international locations which contain the British nation and accordingly the department of energy among Westminster and nearby parliaments of Wales, Scotland and northerly eire. the second one surrounds the uk and the ecu Union.
Political scientists have lengthy categorised platforms of presidency as parliamentary or presidential, two-party or multiparty, and so forth. yet such differences usually fail to supply worthy insights. for instance, how are we to check the U.S., a presidential bicameral regime with vulnerable events, to Denmark, a parliamentary unicameral regime with many powerful events?
Additional info for The Sword of the Archangel: Fascist Ideology in Romania
While being Latino is not a signi‹cant predictor of candidate evaluation, it is signi‹cant in models accounting for partisanship and issue position. In the ‹nal model predicting vote choice, Latinos do not behave signi‹cantly differently from Anglos, but partisanship is the best predictor of vote preference for Morales (the Latino Democrat), and being Latino is the best predictor of Democratic partisanship. Thus, Graves and Lee conclude that “ethnicity exerts a substantial indirect in›uence on [Latinos’] voting preference” (234).
Additional support for candidate-centered elections comes from Watten- 34 / ethnic cues berg (1987, 1994) and Abramowitz (1989), who argue that voters pay attention to candidates, not parties. While Abramowitz describes voters as rational utility maximizers who vote for the candidate closest to their own ideology and with the best shot at winning, Wattenberg views candidates as central because of a larger decline in partisan attachment and the diminishing role of party organizations. Despite their differences, the two scholars agree that voters are now paying more attention to candidates, providing an opportunity for the race and ethnicity of the candidate to play a central role.
Media focus on candidates’ ethnicity. Unless a minority group comprises a clear majority in the geographic voting area—city, state, or legislative district—minority candidates need the support of nonminority voters. Thus, not all ethnic candidates will make clear ethnic appeals during the campaign. Independent of the level of ethnic campaigning undertaken by ethnic candidates, however, the media will no doubt sensationalize the candidacy through an ethnic lens. A. ’s Runoff Could Elect a Latino Mayor”—USA Today5 These headlines clearly demonstrate the media’s reliance on ethnic adjectives to describe ethnic candidates.
The Sword of the Archangel: Fascist Ideology in Romania by Radu Ioanid